
Navigation
in webspace is a crucial topic in web design. Hypermedia can
be liberating, allowing the user to plot their own course
through a body of information, or it can be disorienting,
when users get lost in hyperspace. Giving users clear
signposts about where they are in your site (orientation)
and paying attention to structure can make a site much
easier to traverse.
Structure
Lai
and Waugh [4]
conducted research on types of hypertext menu designs and
their effect on search tasks. Their design featured these
types of menu structures:
|
Option
1
|
Option
2
|
Option
3
|
|
- menus
based solely on hierarchical
structures
The
Home Page menu for this site is an example of a
hierarchical structure. Each of the menu items is a
main topic in the site, with the exception of the
Table of Contents, which is an orienting
device.
|
- menus
which featured a mixture of hierarchical and
embedded structures (a hierarchical overview
with embedded links on the pages for
elaboration)
Here's
a link to a page which uses a mixture of
hierarchical menus and embedded links:
http://www.useit.com/
|
- a
system of embedded menus (which consisted
entirely of contextual links embedded in
text)
Here's
a link to an article which is composed almost
completely of embedded menus:
http://www.useit.com/papers/heuristic/
|
Lai
and Waugh Conclusions:
- network
structured documents (Options 2 & 3) could improve
search accuracy, though not efficiency
- the
search task affected the type of menu used, with
hierarchical menus (Option 1) working better for
straightforward tasks
- embedded
menus (Options 2 & 3) may be used when search tasks
are mostly complex and not fully known and the designers
wish to encourage in-depth searching behavior" (p.
46-47)
Lynch
and Horton [5]
also recommend a hierarchical structure since "web sites
should always be organized as offshoots of a single home
page."
Orientation
Orientation
information helps the user to identify where he(she) is in
the site. It is equivalent to page numbers and chapter
headings in a book. Orientation information is easiest to
use if it is located in the same place on every page. It is
crucial in web design since users may jump into your site at
any level. Lynch and Horton [5]
recommend that the following items should be present on
every page of a site to aid in orientation:
- the
title
- the
author
- the
author's institutional affiliations
- the
revision date
- links
on each page which will move the user to the next or
previous page of a sequence
- a
link to the local home page
Nielsen
[6]
suggests these ways a designer can aid their users with
navigation:
- include
a site identifier on every page
- make
it easy to go to landmark pages such as the home page or
the search page
- emphasize
the structure of your site by making each page show which
subsite it belongs to
- do
not change the default colors for links and visited
links
- keep
underlines intact for monochrome viewers
- draw
a sitemap or use some other orienting devices to
illustrate the relationships between main areas of your
site
Orientation
devices which can keep a user from becoming lost
include:
- the
alphabetized site index - Rosenfeld [7]
- graphical
browsers
- overview
diagrams
- web
views
- paths
- trails
- guided
tours and tabletops
- history
lists
- timestamps
- footprints
- bookmarks
- backtracks
- embedded
menus
- fisheye
views
- roam
and zoom techniques - Balasubramanian
[1]
Shneiderman
[8]
suggests four different techniques to convey a site's
organization:
- use
an executive summary which gives an overview of the site
and contains links to all the major concepts
- adopt
a hierarchical approach which links to major categories
only
- design
the home page as a detailed table of contents
- provide
a search option as a first step
A
word of warning: using search engines may not be such
a good idea - recent research on within-site searching found
that "users were 50 percent more likely to find what they
were looking for if they never hit the search button"
([2]
p.1).
Breadth
vs Depth in Menus
When
designing navigation throughout a site, the research
suggests that several large menus work better than a large
number of menus with smaller amounts of links. Research
which studies breadth vs depth in menus suggests that
"breadth should be preferred over depth...when the depth
goes to four or five [levels], there is a good
chance of users becoming lost or disoriented
([8],
p. 249).
Ways
of grouping menus:
- create
groups of logically similar items
- form
groups that cover all possibilities
- make
sure the items are non overlapping - use familiar
terminology, but ensure that items are distinct from one
another
Based
on web research conducted by Spool
[9],
Instone
[3]
suggests:
The
best-rated sites coupled their navigation and content
tightly. If you doubled the amount of content, the
navigation pages would have doubled in size. The
navigational links tended to be textual, and descriptive,
so that users knew what to expect even before they
jumped.
Conclusions
Research
indicates these guidelines:
Structure
Hierarchical
menus are useful for straightforward searching tasks, but
the additional clarification available from embedded,
contextual menus will aid complex search tasks.
Therefore, designing menus to be more verbose, or adding
information in the form of textual indexes with
clarification will help users to be more successful in
finding what they are looking for.
Orientation
It
is very important to include site information on every
page of a site. It is also essential to include links to
the local home page on every page to accommodate users
who jump into your site. Links to other pages in a
sequence are also useful.
Categorization
of information into menus is a very difficult process as
well as one which needs careful attention. Menu items
need to be unique, non-overlapping and familiar. It is
better, when designing a structure, to have breadth over
depth (fewer long menus as opposed to many shorter
menus).
Orienting
devices such as textual indexes, guided tours or overview
diagrams are useful to help users from becoming
disoriented in a site.
Navigation
information is easiest to use if located in a similar
location on every page of a site. This lowers cognitive
load since the user knows where things are located from
page to page.
[1]
Balasubramanian, V. (1993) A systematic approach to
user interface design for a hypertext framework.
[Online]. Available: http://www.isg.sfu.ca/~duchier/misc/hypertext_review/chapter4.html
[2] Festa, P.
(1998). Web design not what you pay for.
[Online]. Available: http://www.news.com/News/Item/0,4,21150,00.html
[3] Instone, K. (1997). A
case for conducting user tests. [Online]. Available: http://www.webreview.com/1997/07_25/designers/07_25_97_2.shtml
[4] Lai, Y,
& Waugh, M. L. (1995). Effects of three different
hypertextual menu designs on various information searching
activities. Journal of Multimedia and Hypermedia,
4 (1), 25-52.
[5] Lynch, P.
& Horton, S. (1997). Web style manual, 2nd ed.
Yale Center for Advanced Instructional Media.
[Online]. Available: http://info.med.yale.edu/caim/manual/contents.html
[6] Nielsen,
J. (Nov. 1997). The tyranny of the page: Continued
lack of decent navigation support in version 4 browsers.
[Online]. Available: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/9711a.html
[7] Rosenfeld, L. (1997).
Organizing your site from A to Z. [Online]. Available:
http://www.webreview.com/1997/10_03/strategists/10_03_97_4.shtml
[8]
Shneiderman, B. (1998). Designing the user interface:
Strategies for effective human-computer interaction (3rd
ed.) . Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing.
[9] Spool, J.
Web Site Usability: A Designer's Guide. [Online].
Available: http://world.std.com/~uieweb/bookexpt.htm
|